Thursday, September 5, 2013

VoteIRVSharonAnderson_1stMayorSt.Paul,MN

Sharon Anderson
Residence Address:   1058 Summit Ave
P.O. Box 4384     www.sharon4mayor2014.blogspot.com
St Paul, MN 55104-0384
651-776-5835
sharon4anderson@gmail.com

Chris Coleman Techinally the PaynePhalen Video deposes Chris Coleman in  BAD FAITH.

Community Mhttp://spnn.org/video/community-meeting-payne-phalen-district-council-response-to-violent-crime-incidentseeting - Payne Phalen District Council ... -YouTube



Residence Address:686 Chippewa Ave
St Paul, MN 55107
Campaign Address:PO Box 14447
St Paul, MN 55114
651-243-2220
chriscolemancampaign@gmail.com

Tim Holden
Residence Address:1631 Blair Ave
St Paul, MN 55104
Campaign Address:1607 University Avenue
St Paul, MN 55104
651-387-8075
holdenformayor@gmail.com
Kurt (Dirty Kurty) Dornfeld
Residence Address:1044 Geranium Ave E
St Paul, MN 55106
763-218-4390 Click on Pic larger View http://xnet.co.ramsey.mn.us/elections/precinct_finder/sampleballot.aspx?precinctid=680&filenum=1
 
Thurs.5Sept.2013  Ballots are Printed  Very Confusing as Sections do not Rotate Candidates Names, triggering Invalid Ballots  Vote4 SharonAnderson ONLY. Thank You.

Sun.28Jul2013

Sharon4Seniors_St.PaulMayor

Filing Statement


Thumbnail13:58

Congressional Testimony: Sharon Anderson to Bill Windsor of Lawless America

Affiant Sharon Anderson aka Maiden Name Peterson_Chergosky_1st husband Scarrella VA WIDOW FILES 4 ST.PAUL MAYOR








EXPOSING 40 YEARS CORRUPTION RE: PROPERTY TAXES IE: lOU MCKENNA'S AS RAMSEY CO. AUDITOR UP TO INCLUDING 2013 MARK OSWALD RICO_PONZI SCHEMES.

Going thro old Forensic Cold Cases

US vs. Edward J. Devitt re: Pojar 1975

up to the Destruction of Files 2004



Steinhauser et al vs. City St. PaulCivil 04-2632 JNE/SRN

Harrilal,Gallagher et al vs. Steve Magner et al 05-461 05-1348

USSC 10-1032




Public Officials who in their Offiial Capacities for Greed,Power have created Death,Disabilitys,Disparagement of Titles, Stealing RealEstate,Cars,Trailers, even Sharons Porta Potty.

MUST ABOLISH DSI

Sharon4anderson’s Weblog


« Sharons QuoWarranto v. MN Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031
Gearins Unallotment “Files”62cv09-11693_62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) »
Sharons Informal Brief re: FIAFEA_FIRREA_A09-2031
December 26, 2009 by sharon4anderson

Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen | Google Groups State Court Administrator’s Office Sue Dosal
(651) 296-2474 (phone) (651) 297-5636 (fax)
Send an email via our contact form Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC)
Suite #: 135_25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
FAX TRANSMITTAL INFORMAL BRIEF QUITAM_RELATOR

fiafea & firrea – Google Search
FIAFEA FIRREA Banking Regulations – Google Search

Legal Published E-Service: Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) Appellate A09-2031(ToussaintSt. Paul, MN 5515
www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson and www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson


AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:

TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court,
Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us  tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us 
2nd Jud.Court Admin. Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us       651-266-8266 F 266-8278

Sheriff:
bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us          651-266-9333 F 266-9301

Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us  mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us        651-266-2171 F 266-2177

Susan Gaertner
rca@co.ramsey.mn.us  jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us  266-3222 F 266-3010

Lori Swanson MN_AG
attorney.general@state.mn.us             651-296-3353 F 282-2155

St.Paul City Clerk
shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us              
651-266-8688 F 266-8574

and all others as their interest appear.

FROM:
Sharon4Mayor@aol.com http://taxthemax.blogspot.com 651-776-5835

FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES

IN COURT APPEALS STATE OF MINNESOTA

A09-2031(Toussaint)-A06-1150(Russell Anderson)-C6-88-859(Huspenie) etal 62CV09-11693(Gearin) Ramsey Dist Crt. Example

Appellant-QuiTam-Relator Sharon4Anderson’s

Informal Brief pdf Format

62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)SumJudg8Sept09 Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951
QuoWarranto A06 1150 30 Jun06



STATE OF MINNESOTA,ALL AGENCIES, REVENUE,Ward Einess COMMERCE, Glenn Wilson,PUBLIC SAFETY,Michael Campion,CITY ST.PAUL,Kathy Lantry,COUNTY RAMSEY,AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor, Canvass Board,
State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori
Swanson
www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul
Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry et al,
www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board
and County Commissioners,
www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hunter, Aaron Foster, Police Impound Lot, Rapid Towing et al in
their Official Capacitys, Individually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe
and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg
Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66
Million Dollars. In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NW 2nd 562 Plaintiffs
V.
http://eastsidereviewnews.1upprelaunch.com/SiteImages/FileGallery/Ramsey_Co_Tax_03-18-09_208.pdf
Page 53_697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43
St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant James R. Anderson et al,
www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist
Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella
www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 101 Blogs
www.sharon4anderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and
3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice
A.Peterson. Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple AbsoluteNotice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169 Defendants: 3rd Party Plaintiffs
www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com
Memorandumn

Well not according to the law! All public servants are accountable. So let us address accountability.

The oath of office is a contract which financially binds you, the public servant, to honor the oath of office. The oath to which you swore to protect the Constitution.
  1. You are a trustee of the public trust.
  2. You have specific duties to members you serve.
  3. You are public servants!
As trustees regardless of your position, be it a member of a city council or a member of a county board of superiors, as a public servant you are responsible to your constituents to provide the same Constitutional protections as granted in the federal and state Constitutions.
Of special note is a Republic Form of government and an environment where one can pursue life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Failure to provide such protections is a direct violation of your oath of office and a breach of your fiduciary obligations.
Under civil rights laws your failure to properly discharge your responsibilities in any of these matters exposes you to personal financial liability. Under the law, all of your personal assets may be seized and LIQUIDATED to satisfy damage claims submitted by injured parties. That would be any citizen who feels their rights have been violated.
The oath of office has no limitations of any kind. The oath of office has no limitations or jurisdictions. The oath does however specify you must honor your oath and protect the Constitution from ALL enemies domestic and foreign.
As public servants you have no rights what so ever. As public employees—servants to the people—You only have the duty to honor your oath and perform the work of the people as prescribed by law.
You have no discretion as to whether or not you will honor your oath. You are directed to do so. There are no options other than to resign if you can not fulfill the requirements as necessary. Otherwise you are guilty of accepting employment under false pretenses and committing fraud. Under certain conditions, even if you retire or resign, you may be subject to prosecution for failing to properly execute your lawful job requirements.
For your information and consideration you might consider the following:

Misprision of a Felony

63C AM.JUR.2D, PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
* *63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, §247* “As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised on behalf of the government or of all citizens who may need the intervention of the officer.

  • [1] Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever level of government, and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people, and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts.
  • [2] That is, a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves.
  • [3] and owes a fiduciary duty to the public.
  • [4] It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual
  • [5] Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official who tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy. Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit-and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears [483 U.S. 372] in the statute. See United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir1985) includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public, including, in the case of a judge, the litigants who appear before him and if he deliberately conceals material information from them, he is guilty of fraud. McNally v United States 483 U.S. 350 (1987)

The 1866 Civil Rights Act

First Amendment Administrative Commercial Lien Process

A Consensual Public Commercial Lien is:
>1. A Commercial Lien against a Public Official’s violation of their required Official Oath, which is equal to the Military Oath, to support this Nation and its Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, [This Lien is supported by the filing of a Criminal Complaint.]
>2. And also is, a Commercial Lien against the Public Official’s Rebellion, Insurrection or Treason committed against the Nation and its Constitution,
>3. And also is, consequently, a Commercial Lien against the Public Official’s violation of the Natural and Civil Rights of Freedom; Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, of the People of the United States of America.
>4. And also is, a penalty against the Public Official’s failure to provide the necessary, proper and lawful Services, which have been paid for by the Public through Taxation, and a penalty against the Public Officials for substituting False, Fictitious and Fraudulent Services,
>5. And also is, therefore, to provide restitution and rebate of taxes back to the Public as an exercise of the First Amendment “…right of the People peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” —-to guarantee “Just Compensation” for Taxes.
“This Constitution shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.” (U.S. Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 2.) See also Amendment 5 –“Just Compensation”.



                  

Friday, August 2, 2013

Sharon_Peterson_Scarrella_Anderson St.PaulMayoral_vs_ChrisColeman

                                                       1058 Summit Sharons Homestead Flipped since 1988 http://rrinfo.co.ramsey.mn.us/public/characteristic/Parcel.aspx?scrn=Quick&pin=022823320075&cnt=0    Legal Notice on the Graves of Affiants Tenants in
Common Bill and Bernice A. Peterson, that Bradley J. Benson and Jane E.Baer  do not have
Quiet Title.  Further Benson and Baer have Full Homestead Denied to Affiant Sharon Anderson.   www.sharon4anderson.org  Forensic Files pdf format.
 Apparantly when Chris Coleman was Law Clerk for Judge Doris Huspeni,he wrote the Unpublished Opinion Stealing Sharons Homestead at 1058 Summit on the Disabilitys of the Anderson.  Colemans Patterened Enterprise Stealing our Propertys,Cars etc. mandates his Resignation.

On the Graves of Tenants in Common  Bill and Bernice A. Peterson
 http://sharon4anderson.wordpress.com/2009/12/23/sharons-quowarranto-v-mn-judge-edward-toussaint-a09-2031/   http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/press/press_releases_me

 

Two are challenging Coleman for St. Paul mayor

Minneapolis Star Tribune-Jul 30, 2013
Two candidates — one a familiar name on the St. Paul ballot, the other new to politics — filed Tuesday to challenge Mayor Chris Coleman in ...

Saint Paul Mayor

Sharon Anderson  www.sharon4mayor2014.blogspot.com Residence Address:1058 Summit Ave
P.O. Box 4384
St Paul, MN 55104-0384
651-776-5835  
sharon4anderson@gmail.com 
Chris ColemanResidence Address:  www.chriscoleman.org 
686 Chippewa Ave
St Paul, MN 55107
Campaign Address:PO Box 14447
St Paul, MN 55114
651-243-2220
chriscolemancampaign@gmail.com 
Tim HoldenResidence Address:1631 Blair Ave
St Paul, MN 55104   www.holdenformayor.com
Campaign Address:1607 University Avenue
St Paul, MN 55104
651-387-8075
holdenformayor@gmail.com 
Kurt (Dirty Kurty) DornfeldResidence Address:1044 Geranium Ave E
St Paul, MN 55106
763-218-4390


HUD No. 13-110
George Gonzalez
(202) 708-0685
FOR RELEASE
Friday
July 19, 2013
HUD PUBLISHES NEW PROPOSED RULE ON
AFFIRMATIVELY FURTHERING FAIR HOUSING
WASHINGTON – The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
published a new proposed rule to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing (AFFH) in the Federal Register today and made available background materials and a prototype geospatial tool. AFFH refers to the 1968 Fair Housing Act’s obligation for state and local governments to improve and achieve more meaningful outcomes from fair housing policies, so that every American has the right to fair housing, regardless of their race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability or familial status.
“This proposed rule represents a 21st century approach to fair housing, a step forward to ensuring that every American is able to choose to live in a community they feel proud of – where they have a fair shot at reaching their full potential in life,” said HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan. “For the first time ever, HUD will provide data for every neighborhood in the country, detailing the access African American, Latino, Asian, and other communities have to local assets, including schools, jobs, transportation, and other important neighborhood resources that can play a role in helping people move into the middle class. Long-term solutions will involve various strategies, such as helping people gain access to different neighborhoods and channeling investments into underserved areas.13-

Sent: 8/2/2013 4:17:45 A.M. Central Daylight Time
Subj: Senat

National Whistleblowers Center - Home

 

Since 1988, the Center has used whistleblowers disclosures to improve environmental protection, nuclear safety, and government and corporate accountability.


About Us


 
Home · About Us · History · Program Areas · Changing ...
e re: "National Whistleblower Appreciation Day" Sharon4St.PaulMayor

                                    Affiant re: Penaltys of Pejury demanding Chris Coleman's Resignation.
                                  Forensic Files  www.sharon4anderson.org



Fri.2Aug2013

To the Above Named:

St.Paul Minnesota Hot Bedfor Whistleblowers

Please forward,Circulate Sharon4St.Paul Mayor VA Widow

Whistleblower_ Former RealEstate Entreprenuer. Thanks





In a message dated 8/1/2013 3:17:12 P.M. Central Daylight Time, mjw@whistleblowers.org '

writes:




On July 30, 2013, by unanimous resolution the U.S. Senate declared July 30, 2013 as "National Whistleblower Appreciation Day." The National Whistleblowers Center strongly supports the Senate's historic action and calls on every American reflect upon the tremendous contributions whistleblowers have made to American democracy, as well as the struggles and sacrifices they have endured.


5

HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watch

HUD Sued for Records of Obama Administration Involvement in Controversial St. Paul, MN, Housing Discrimination Case | Judicial Watch
              Affiant Sharon4Anderson@gmail.com  Must use this St.Paul Case in her Mayoral Campaign 


(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a lawsuit (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (No. 1:12-cv-01785)) on November 2, 2012, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to force compliance with an April 4, 2012, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents relating to possible collusion between the Obama administration and the city of St. Paul, MN, in withdrawing a “disparate impact” appeal pending before the U.S. Supreme Court. HUD has refused all JW FOIA requests for public records, even after JW paid in advance for the information.
The disparate impact case arose from a lawsuit by a St. Paul minority contractor claiming that the city’s targeted enforcement of the city’s housing code against rental units reduced the availability of low-income rentals, with a disparate impact upon African-Americans. The Eighth Circuit found in the contractor’s favor, after which the city appealed to the Supreme Court. Generally speaking, under a disparate impact analysis, an entity can be found to have engaged in discriminatory activity for practices that merely have a “disparate impact” on protected minorities, irrespective of any intentional bias.
The Obama DOJ then intervened, apparently persuading St. Paul to take the extraordinary step of withdrawing its cert petition from the Supreme Court docket. On February 13, the Wall Street Journal reported that various federal officials had asked the City of St. Paul to withdraw its petition for certiorari in a controversy that had already been slated for argument before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The Obama administration’s concern, explained the article, was that a legal theory known as “disparate impact” might either: 1) harden into law as used by the landlords who had won at the state level or 2) be eviscerated entirely. Apparently, several federal agencies that rely on that legal theory to secure out-of-court settlements in the consumer lending and family housing arena were reluctant to risk a change in the legal landscape. The next day, the parties to Magner v. Gallagher withdrew their case by mutual consent.
Judicial Watch separately obtained documents under the Minnesota Data Practices Act, showing that St. Paul City Attorney Sara Grewing arranged a meeting between the chief of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division, Tom Perez, and Mayor Chris Coleman a week before the city’s withdrawal from the case, captioned Magner v. Gallagher. Following Perez’s visit, the city withdrew its case and thanked DOJ and officials at HUD for their involvement.
On April 4, Judicial Watch sent a FOIA request to the DOJ and HUD seeking access to the following:
  1. All communications with or about St. Paul, Minnesota, its residents, landlords, low-income properties or employees, specifically those exchanges:
a. relating to the city’s recent petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, including the petition’s withdrawal in February 2012;
b. regarding “disparate impact” theory or analysis in the housing, landlord-tenant, or mortgage arena;
c. involving any member of the U.S. Senate’s Democratic Policy & Communications Committee, the House Democratic Caucus, or the White House, and their respective staffs; and,
d. involving third parties such as the National Low Income Housing Coalition, Thomas Goldstein, orWalter Mondale and their respective staffs;
2. All invoices for travel, food, lodging, communications, or entertainment expenses incurred in connection with any “disparate impact” lawsuit against St. Paul, Minnesota.
In filing its FOIA request, JW requested a waiver of both search and duplication fees, citing its role as a member of the news media. On June 11, 2012, HUD denied JW’s waiver request, informing JW that it would be required to pay a $1,024.43 fee before HUD would release any records.
On June 21, 2012, JW appealed HUD’s denial of a waiver request. On July 23, HUD denied JW’s appeal, and on July 31, JW paid the waiver fee in full.
Despite payment in full, and despite repeated inquiries from JW about the status of its FOIA request, HUD has continued to refuse to release of the documents requested by JW.
“We have reason to believe that the Obama administration improperly and successfully pressured St. Paul city officials to take the extremely rare action of withdrawing an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The Obama administration and its liberal activist allies are desperate to protect their ability to use the discredited ‘disparate impact’ legal standard in lawsuits in order to shakedown businesses and reward allies.”
Read more about

Shewolfeagle's shared items

Sharon Can Do It

Sharon Can Do It
Take back our Government