STATE OF
MINNESOTA
RAMSEY COUNTY
ELECTIONS
90 PLATO BLVD W #160
ST.PAUL,MN 55107
IN THE MATTER OF MAYORAL CANDIDATE MRS. SHARON
ANDERSON
AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY HANDING TO
AND SENDING
IN THE US POSTOFFICE IN ST. PAUL,
PRIORITY MAIL
STAMPED USPS TRACKING 9114 9999 4423
8000 3291 05
MON.31JUL2017
SUMMARY Sent: 7/28/2017 11:22:58 A.M.
Central Daylight Time
City St. Paul is Sanctuary, Sharon
alleges that Police Chief, City Attorney be Elected, All Citizens must arm
themselves with Camera, Mace etc.
Expose the Ponzi Taxing Schemes,
Abolish DSI as Duplication.
Enforce MN Const. Art.III Separation
of Powers
a. If only Lawyers can be
Judges, then We the People must
expell Lawyers in the Executive and
Legislative Branchs. MS 211b.07 undue influence on Voters, Taxpayers, Homeowners
et al
EX1 AFFIDAVIT OF CANDIDACY
$500FilingFee24420139345
b. triggering Steinhauser letter
below Excessive Lawyers Case Fixing, Bribery or City Officials Fees re Fair
Housing must be exposed. $200 Million at Issue.
d. Reporter Fred Melo
apparantly has numerous Files.
Ex7. 8 Bogus City Assessments without
Valid Complaints DSI MUST BE ABOLISHED for Fraud.
Ex10 Trust Trilogy Case Fixing Acting US
Attorney Lillehaug
Ex 11 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19 Court Doc
Affiant Denied Due Process
Ex. 20 Corruption re Humphrey Affiant ran
for AG again with this Booklet
May have to scann in the Ex 20 lost
Ex.21,22,23 Trust Misplaced by Roy Spannaus brother
of AG Warren Spannus
Got so many files even i cannot
find
In a message dated 7/28/2017 6:54:23 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
Sharon4Anderson@aol.com writes:
www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com
LEGAL NOTICE: /s/Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx: 651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private
Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower, Candidate AG2010 www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com
Blogger: www.facebook.com/sharon4anderson
www.twitter.com/sharon4anderson Homestead Act
of 1862
neopopulism.org - Pro Se Dec Action Litigation Pack
Sharon4Anderson | Scribd Document's are based on SEC filings, Blogger:
Dashboard Home
| www.slideshare.com/sharonanderson www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
www.sharon4anderson.org FAIR USE NOTICEThis site contains
copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically
authorized by the copyright owner. We are makinknowledge gained as financial
journalists , securities they recommend to readers, affiliated entities,
employees, and agents an initial trade recommendation published on the
Internet, after a direct mail publication is sent, before acting on that
recommendations, and may contain errors. Investment decisions should not be
based solely on these or other Public Office documents expressly forbids its
writers from having financial interests in g such material available in our
efforts to advance understanding of whistleblower protection issues, MY FindLaw
Sharons
www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com
www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
_
http://www.blogger.com/profile/17187848282847569592
The
Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521
et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments,
may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby
notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver
this Message to intended recipients. See:
Quon
v. Arch.
AFFIANT will show a Rico Pattern vs.
City over 20 years.
8uth Cir.File 16-1661 Filed
1Mar2017
based on the State Court Settlement First Baptist
Church62-cv-11-8862
Judge Wm Leary III 93,218Hoeschler Trust Acct filed
8Feb2017
Mon24Jul/2017
QUESTIONS4MAYORALCANDIDATES
WHAT,WHERE IS THE 200
MILLION?
Just sick re MN Courts Lawyers Fees vs. Public
Policy Fair Housing Act
Frank Steinhauser letter
Thanks4Response Its depressing however i
scratched together the $500 fee to run for Mayor
If i live long enough would assist
where i can
In a message dated 7/22/2017 11:07:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time, .com
writes:
We did not settle Sharon.......we walked away with nothing st
all.
We did not settle Sharon.......we walked away with nothing st all.
Back in 2008 when we won our appeal at the 8th Circuit we were supposed to
come back here and get a jury trial. Instead of that the Judge let the other
side make a motion for Summary Judgment again which is against the court rules.
What they wanted was for the individual inspectors to be out of the lawsuit.
Rather than incur legal fees we agreed to it because we thought it would get us
to trial faster. Then instead of trial the Judge ordered us to go to mediation
and that went no where but it did cost us Attorney fees for a day of time. The
the Judge delayed the case until the outcome of "Inclusive Communities was
decided. When that got decided (which helped us) the Judge then ordered us to go
to mediation with a retired Judge. This time it cost us $500.00 an hour plus our
Attorney fees for the day. We didn't settle then either so the Judge just put us
on hold again till last month and then he said he was going to let the city have
another shot at Summary Judgment again. No matter who won that it would have
went back to the 8th circuit for an appeal and if the city lost they then would
have went back to the Supreme Court again. We didn't have enough money to finish
this thing so we just walked away to be able to keep what money we had left.
They would have just kept going with one thing or another with their bought and
paid for courts and judges till we were broke and we would be in the same place
we are now. They did not want a trial because they knew we would win.
Frnak
From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
<Sharon4Anderson@aol.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 8:55
AM
To: GRIM_63@MSN.COM
Cc:
sharon4anderson@aol.com
Subject: Check out Landlords of low-income
renters withdraw suits against St. Paul – T
http://citystpaul-ponzi-principal.blogspot.com/
www.sharon4mayor2018.blogspot.com
Mon24Jul/2017
QUESTIONS4MAYORALCANDIDATES
WHAT,WHERE IS THE 200
MILLION?
Just sick re MN Courts Lawyers Fees vs. Public
Policy Fair Housing Act
Frank Steinhauser letter
Thanks4Response Its depressing however i
scratched together the $500 fee to run for Mayor
If i live long enough would assist
where i can
In a message dated 7/22/2017 11:07:24 P.M. Central Daylight Time, .com
writes:
We did not settle Sharon.......we walked away with nothing st
all.
Back in 2008 when we won our appeal at the 8th Circuit we were supposed to
come back here and get a jury trial. Instead of that the Judge let the other
side make a motion for Summary Judgment again which is against the court rules.
What they wanted was for the individual inspectors to be out of the lawsuit.
Rather than incur legal fees we agreed to it because we thought it would get us
to trial faster. Then instead of trial the Judge ordered us to go to mediation
and that went no where but it did cost us Attorney fees for a day of time. The
the Judge delayed the case until the outcome of "Inclusive Communities was
decided. When that got decided (which helped us) the Judge then ordered us to go
to mediation with a retired Judge. This time it cost us $500.00 an hour plus our
Attorney fees for the day. We didn't settle then either so the Judge just put us
on hold again till last month and then he said he was going to let the city have
another shot at Summary Judgment again. No matter who won that it would have
went back to the 8th circuit for an appeal and if the city lost they then would
have went back to the Supreme Court again. We didn't have enough money to finish
this thing so we just walked away to be able to keep what money we had left.
They would have just kept going with one thing or another with their bought and
paid for courts and judges till we were broke and we would be in the same place
we are now. They did not want a trial because they knew we would win.
Frnak
From: Sharon4Anderson@aol.com
<Sharon4Anderson@aol.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2017 8:55
AM
Cc:
sharon4anderson@aol.com
Subject: Check out Landlords of low-income
renters withdraw suits against St. Paul – T
