Sunday, July 28, 2013

Sharon4St.Paul_Seniors_Surety_Sanity












 
Sun.28Jul2013
Sharon4Seniors_St.PaulMayor
Filing Statement
Thumbnail13:58

Congressional Testimony: Sharon Anderson to Bill Windsor of Lawless America

Affiant Sharon Anderson aka Maiden Name Peterson_Chergosky_1st husband Scarrella VA WIDOW FILES 4 ST.PAUL MAYOR
EXPOSING 40 YEARS CORRUPTION RE: PROPERTY TAXES IE: lOU MCKENNA'S AS RAMSEY CO. AUDITOR UP TO INCLUDING 2013 MARK OSWALD RICO_PONZI SCHEMES.
Going thro old Forensic Cold Cases
US vs. Edward J. Devitt re: Pojar 1975
up to the Destruction of Files 2004
Steinhauser et al vs. City St. PaulCivil 04-2632 JNE/SRN
Harrilal,Gallagher et al vs. Steve Magner et al 05-461 05-1348
USSC 10-1032
Public Officials who in their Offiial Capacities for Greed,Power have created Death,Disabilitys,Disparagement of Titles, Stealing RealEstate,Cars,Trailers, even Sharons Porta Potty.
MUST ABOLISH DSI
Sharon4anderson’s Weblog
« Sharons QuoWarranto v. MN Judge Edward Toussaint A09-2031
Gearins Unallotment “Files”62cv09-11693_62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) »
Sharons Informal Brief re: FIAFEA_FIRREA_A09-2031
December 26, 2009 by sharon4anderson

Florida: Fraudulent Notices of Federal Tax Lien – a matter for the Statewide Grand Jury. – Lawmen | Google Groups State Court Administrator’s Office Sue Dosal
(651) 296-2474 (phone) (651) 297-5636 (fax)
Send an email via our contact form Minnesota Judicial Center (MJC)
Suite #: 135_25 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
FAX TRANSMITTAL INFORMAL BRIEF QUITAM_RELATOR

fiafea & firrea – Google Search
FIAFEA FIRREA Banking Regulations – Google Search

Legal Published E-Service: Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951 Ramsey Dist.Crt.File 62cv09-1163(Vandenorth) Appellate A09-2031(ToussaintSt. Paul, MN 5515 www.slideshare.com/sharon4anderson and www.scribd.com/sharon4anderson


AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE BY E-COMMERCE AND FAX:

TO: Ramsey Co. Clerk of Court, Lynae.Olson@courts.state.mn.us
  tel:651-266-8255 F 266-8263 mary.jurek@courts.state.mn.us
 
2nd Jud.Court Admin. Larry.Dease@courts.state.mn.us
       651-266-8266 F 266-8278

Sheriff: bob.fletcher@co.ramsey.mn.us
          651-266-9333 F 266-9301

Elections@co.ramsey.mn.us
  mark.oswald@co.ramsey.mn.us
        651-266-2171 F 266-2177

Susan Gaertner rca@co.ramsey.mn.us jean.stepan@co.ramsey.mn.us 266-3222 F 266-3010

Lori Swanson MN_AG attorney.general@state.mn.us 651-296-3353 F 282-2155

St.Paul City Clerk shari.moore@ci.stpaul.mn.us 651-266-8688 F 266-8574

and all others as their interest appear.

FROM: Sharon4Mayor@aol.com Sharon4Anderson@gmail.com
   http://taxthemax.blogspot.com 651-776-5835

FAX VIA OUTGOING: SHARON CANNOT RECEIVE FAXES

IN COURT APPEALS STATE OF MINNESOTA

A09-2031(Toussaint)-A06-1150(Russell Anderson)-C6-88-859(Huspenie) Opponent Chris Coleman was Huspeni's Clerk who stole Homestead at 1058 Summit  etal 62CV09-11693(Gearin) Ramsey Dist Crt. Example

Appellant-QuiTam-Relator Sharon4Anderson’s

Informal Brief pdf Format

62cv09-1163(Vandenorth)SumJudg8Sept09 Ed.Toussaint’sCovert OrderTitle18s1951
QuoWarranto A06 1150 30 Jun06

STATE OF MINNESOTA,ALL AGENCIES, REVENUE,Ward Einess COMMERCE, Glenn Wilson,PUBLIC SAFETY,Michael Campion,CITY ST.PAUL,Kathy Lantry,COUNTY RAMSEY,AUDITOR MARK OSWALD, Elections/Taxes Supervisor, Canvass Board,
State of Minnesota, Rule 24.04 by and thro State Attorney General Lori
Swanson www.ag.state.mn.us, Michael Campion, Public Safety,Larry Dease,Court Administrator,St.Paul
Mayor Chris B. Coleman,City Clerk Shari Moore,Council President Kathy Lantry et al,
www.ci.stpaul.mn.us, Janice Rettman res: No 2009-012,Toni Carter Canvass Board
and County Commissioners, www.co.ramsey.mn.us DSI Bob Kessler,Joel Essling John Harrington Chief Police,his agents , Kathy Wuorinen,Don Luna,Tanya Hunter, Aaron Foster, Police Impound Lot, Rapid Towing et al in
their Official Capacitys, Individually,Severally, acting in concort with John Doe
and Mary Roe. SCAP,Judges Kathleen Gearin,Joanne Smith,Gregg
Johnson,Salvador Rosas,Larry Cohen et al, unk at this time 1988 Files 495722 499129 Default 66
Million Dollars. In re Scarrella4 Assoc. Justice 221NW 2nd 562 Plaintiffs
V.
http://eastsidereviewnews.1upprelaunch.com/SiteImages/FileGallery/Ramsey_Co_Tax_03-18-09_208.pdf
Page 53_697 SURREY AVE 32.29.22.41.0053$2,499.43
St.Paul,MN.55106 ,Intestate Decedant James R. Anderson et al,
www.cpljimanderson.blogspot.com ,VA Widow,Senior,Disabled Political Activist
Sharon Anderson aka Peterson_Chergosky_Scarrella
www.sharon4staterep64a.blogspot.com http://sharon4council.blogspot.com
http://sharon4privateattorneygeneral.blogspot.com + 101 Blogs
www.sharon4anderson.org , et al as their interest appear , Defendants and
3rd Party Plaintiffs,Intestate Decedants Tenant in Common Wm.O and Bernice
A.Peterson. Title to Sharons Cars,Trailers,Peterbilt,Realestate in Fee Simple AbsoluteNotice: Ins.Claim Stolen 91 Chrysler V-1C4GY54R5MX597169 Defendants: 3rd Party Plaintiffs www.sharonagmn2010.blogspot.com
Memorandumn

Well not according to the law! All public servants are accountable. So let us address accountability.

The oath of office is a contract which financially binds you, the public servant, to honor the oath of office. The oath to which you swore to protect the Constitution.
  1. You are a trustee of the public trust.
  2. You have specific duties to members you serve.
  3. You are public servants!
As trustees regardless of your position, be it a member of a city council or a member of a county board of superiors, as a public servant you are responsible to your constituents to provide the same Constitutional protections as granted in the federal and state Constitutions.
Of special note is a Republic Form of government and an environment where one can pursue life liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Failure to provide such protections is a direct violation of your oath of office and a breach of your fiduciary obligations.
Under civil rights laws your failure to properly discharge your responsibilities in any of these matters exposes you to personal financial liability. Under the law, all of your personal assets may be seized and LIQUIDATED to satisfy damage claims submitted by injured parties. That would be any citizen who feels their rights have been violated.
The oath of office has no limitations of any kind. The oath of office has no limitations or jurisdictions. The oath does however specify you must honor your oath and protect the Constitution from ALL enemies domestic and foreign.
As public servants you have no rights what so ever. As public employees—servants to the people—You only have the duty to honor your oath and perform the work of the people as prescribed by law.
You have no discretion as to whether or not you will honor your oath. You are directed to do so. There are no options other than to resign if you can not fulfill the requirements as necessary. Otherwise you are guilty of accepting employment under false pretenses and committing fraud. Under certain conditions, even if you retire or resign, you may be subject to prosecution for failing to properly execute your lawful job requirements.
For your information and consideration you might consider the following:

Misprision of a Felony

63C AM.JUR.2D, PUBLIC OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
* *63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, §247* “As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised on behalf of the government or of all citizens who may need the intervention of the officer.
  • [1] Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever level of government, and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people, and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts.
  • [2] That is, a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves.
  • [3] and owes a fiduciary duty to the public.
  • [4] It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual
  • [5] Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official who tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy. Fraud in its elementary common law sense of deceit-and this is one of the meanings that fraud bears [483 U.S. 372] in the statute. See United States v. Dial, 757 F.2d 163, 168 (7th Cir1985) includes the deliberate concealment of material information in a setting of fiduciary obligation. A public official is a fiduciary toward the public, including, in the case of a judge, the litigants who appear before him and if he deliberately conceals material information from them, he is guilty of fraud. McNally v United States 483 U.S. 350 (1987)

The 1866 Civil Rights Act

First Amendment Administrative Commercial Lien Process

A Consensual Public Commercial Lien is:
>1. A Commercial Lien against a Public Official’s violation of their required Official Oath, which is equal to the Military Oath, to support this Nation and its Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic, [This Lien is supported by the filing of a Criminal Complaint.]
>2. And also is, a Commercial Lien against the Public Official’s Rebellion, Insurrection or Treason committed against the Nation and its Constitution,
>3. And also is, consequently, a Commercial Lien against the Public Official’s violation of the Natural and Civil Rights of Freedom; Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, of the People of the United States of America.
>4. And also is, a penalty against the Public Official’s failure to provide the necessary, proper and lawful Services, which have been paid for by the Public through Taxation, and a penalty against the Public Officials for substituting False, Fictitious and Fraudulent Services,
>5. And also is, therefore, to provide restitution and rebate of taxes back to the Public as an exercise of the First Amendment “…right of the People peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” —-to guarantee “Just Compensation” for Taxes.
“This Constitution shall be the Supreme Law of the Land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.” (U.S. Constitution, Article VI, paragraph 2.) See also Amendment 5 –“Just Compensation”.



 

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Shewolfeagle's shared items

Sharon Can Do It

Sharon Can Do It
Take back our Government