Hey Fred if i can scrapped together the
$500
lI may file Changelling
Constitutionality of Excessive Consumption based on the Citys Ponzi Taxing
Schemes.
Got the Tax Statements still have the
ROW assessments submitted to the County http://www.rawstory.com/2013/10/st-paul-mayor-laughs-throughout-wacky-candidates-forum/
NOTHING WACKY GOING BLIND OR EXPOSING PONZI TAXING SCHEMES
ON THE GRAVES OF TENANTS IN COMMONAT 1058 SUMMIT, GRAVES OF ALICE KRENGEL AND REV.MARYJANE DUCHENE.
AFFIANT RE PENALITY OF PURJURY, HAVEING BEEN REDUCED TO POVERTY, WILL FILE FOR MAYOR AGAIN 2017
Tim Holden announces candidacy for St. Paul mayor - Pioneer Press
www.twincities.com/.../investor-says-hes-selling-st-paul-properties-to-run-for-mayor/
16 hours ago - Tim
Holden campaigns for Mayor of St.
Paul in front of the Ford Plant in Highland Park in October 2013. Holden
announced Tuesday, March 21, ..
THEREFORE Notice to City Attorney
Samuel Clark and Co. Attorney John Choi et al
ISSUES Separation
of Powers False Billings, Fraudulent Taxes to steal Propertys We must Abolish
DSI
Wilful Neglience to Answer
via Electronic Commerce and to keep Records.
All law suits vs. City
must be opened to the Public
$3.2M Fine for Failure to Protect Electronic Records
The
Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) fined a Texas hospital $3.2 million for its impermissible disclosure of
unsecured electronic protected health information (ePHI) and non-compliance over
many years with multiple standards of the HIPAA Security Rule.
Children’s
Medical Center of Dallas filed breach reports with OCR in 2010 and again in
2013. The first report indicated the loss of an unencrypted, non-password
protected BlackBerry device at the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport on
November 19, 2009. That device contained the ePHI of approximately 3,800
individuals. On July 5, 2013, the medical center filed a separate HIPAA Breach
Notification Report with OCR, reporting the theft of an unencrypted laptop from
its premises sometime between April 4 and April 9, 2013. The Hospital reported
the laptop contained the ePHI of 2,462 individuals.
OCR’s
investigation found that, despite knowledge of the risk of maintaining
unencrypted ePHI on its devices as early as 2007 (identified through medical
center’s own risk assessments), the medical center failed to implement risk
management plans and failed to deploy encryption or an equivalent alternative
measure on all of its laptops, work stations, mobile devices and removable
storage media until at least April 9, 2013. When announcing the fine, OCR stated
“a lack of risk management not only costs individuals the security of their
data, but it can also cost covered entities a sizable fine.” This fine indicates
that even with the change of administration, OCR seems likely to continue itsaggressive approach to HIPAA enforcement.
This
action demonstrates again the importance of creating a culture of security where
your employees are cognizant of the potential ill-effects of failing to
safeguard personal information. This is especially true as OCR’s enforcement
activities are not simply focused on the harm to individuals, but instead focus
on compliance. HIPAA covered entities and business associates should
regularly assess their risk of disclosing protected health information and –
-just as importantly – address the issues identified during those assessments
which would include the implementation of appropriate safeguards and conducting
regular HIPAA training for employees.
$3.2M Fine for Failure to Protect Electronic Records
The
Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights (“OCR”) fined a Texas hospital $3.2 million for its impermissible disclosure of
unsecured electronic protected health information (ePHI) and non-compliance over
many years with multiple standards of the HIPAA Security Rule.
Children’s
Medical Center of Dallas filed breach reports with OCR in 2010 and again in
2013. The first report indicated the loss of an unencrypted, non-password
protected BlackBerry device at the Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport on
November 19, 2009. That device contained the ePHI of approximately 3,800
individuals. On July 5, 2013, the medical center filed a separate HIPAA Breach
Notification Report with OCR, reporting the theft of an unencrypted laptop from
its premises sometime between April 4 and April 9, 2013. The Hospital reported
the laptop contained the ePHI of 2,462 individuals.
OCR’s
investigation found that, despite knowledge of the risk of maintaining
unencrypted ePHI on its devices as early as 2007 (identified through medical
center’s own risk assessments), the medical center failed to implement risk
management plans and failed to deploy encryption or an equivalent alternative
measure on all of its laptops, work stations, mobile devices and removable
storage media until at least April 9, 2013. When announcing the fine, OCR stated
“a lack of risk management not only costs individuals the security of their
data, but it can also cost covered entities a sizable fine.” This fine indicates
that even with the change of administration, OCR seems likely to continue itsaggressive approach to HIPAA enforcement.
This
action demonstrates again the importance of creating a culture of security where
your employees are cognizant of the potential ill-effects of failing to
safeguard personal information. This is especially true as OCR’s enforcement
activities are not simply focused on the harm to individuals, but instead focus
on compliance. HIPAA covered entities and business associates should
regularly assess their risk of disclosing protected health information and –
-just as importantly – address the issues identified during those assessments
which would include the implementation of appropriate safeguards and conducting
regular HIPAA training for employees.
ECF_P165913Pacersa1299 telfx:
651-776-5835:
Attorney ProSe_InFact,Private Attorney General QuiTam Whistleblower,
www.sharon4mnag.blogspot.com
www.taxthemax.blogspot.com
_
http://www.blogger.com/profile/17187848282847569592
The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.
Ch.119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this "Message,"
including attachments, may contain the originator's
proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies
recipients Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based
actions. Authorized carriers of this message
shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See:
Quon
v. Arch.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.